Journal: Nucleic Acids Research
Article Title: Physical and functional interaction between yeast Pif1 helicase and Rim1 single-stranded DNA binding protein
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1088
Figure Lengend Snippet: Purification and characterization of recombinant Rim1 protein and its C-terminal truncation variant. ( A ) Multiple sequence alignment of eukaryotic mitochondrial SSBs and bacterial SSBs using the ClustalW2 program to determine the C-terminal tail region of Rim1. The sequences for H. sapiens mtSSB ( Hs mtSSB) (GenBank™ accession: NP_003134), Xenopus laevis mtSSB ( Xl mtSSB) (GenBank™ accession: NP_001095241), Bombyx mori mtSSB ( Bm mtSSB) (GenBank™ accession: ABF51293), D. melanogaster mtSSB ( Dm mtSSB) (GenBank™ accession: AAF16936), E. coli SSB ( Ec SSB) (GenBank™ accession: YP_859663), Thermotoga maritima ( Tm SSB) (GenBank™ accession: Q9WZ73), Deinococcus radiodurans SSB ( Dr SSB) (GenBank™ accession: Q9RY51) and S. cerevisiae Rim1 ( Sc Rim1) (GenBank™ accession: AAB22978) are used for the alignment. The sequence alignment determined that the first 100 amino acids from the N-terminal end of Rim1 are involved in formation of the OB-fold domain, and the remaining 18 amino acids from the C-terminal end form the putative unstructured tail region. The amino acid sequences involved in the formation of the C-terminal tails of SSB proteins are highlighted in gray. The C-terminal tail of Rim1 contains five acidic amino acids that are indicated in bold. ( B ) Coomassie blue stained 15% SDS–PAGE gel to visualize purified Rim1 (lane 2) and Rim1ΔC18 (lane 2). The purified proteins were >95% homogenous as assessed from the gel. ( C ) SEC-MALS detection reveals that the Rim1 and Rim1ΔC18 exist as a tetramer. The theoretical MM of monomeric Rim1 and Rim1ΔC18 is 13.29 and 11.43 kDa, respectively. The observed MM and hydrodynamic radius ( R h ) for Rim1 and Rim1ΔC18 proteins are as indicated. ( D ) Rim1 binding affinity for ssDNA was evaluated by fluorescence anisotropy. The anisotropy values for Rim1 binding to 1 nM 3′F-T 20 (open diamonds) and 3′F-T 70 (closed diamonds) were plotted as average values from three experiments with a standard deviation. Rim1 binding data to 3′F-T 20 were fit to the Hill equation resulting in a Hill coefficient of 2.5 and an apparent K d of 3.1 ± 0.1 nM (tetramer). Rim1 binding to 3′F-T 70 is stoichiometric under the conditions used here ( K d value <1 nM). ( E ) Anisotropy values for binding of Rim1ΔC18 to 1 nM 3′F-T 20 (open triangles) and 3′F-T 70 (closed triangles) were plotted as averages from three experiments with a standard deviation. Rim1ΔC18 binding to 3′F-T 20 was fit to the Hill equation resulting in a Hill coefficient value of 1.6 ± 0.1 and an apparent K d value of 3.5 ± 0.2 nM (tetramer). Rim1ΔC18 binding to 3′F-T 70 resulted in two apparent binding modes. A tight binding mode that appears similar to Rim1 ( K d value <1 nM) and a weaker binding mode that did not saturate under these conditions.
Article Snippet: Rim1 protein was further purified by passing it through a strong anion exchange column (Macro-Prep High Q Support, Bio-Rad) with a gradient salt elution of 150 mM to 2 M NaCl.
Techniques: Purification, Recombinant, Variant Assay, Sequencing, Staining, SDS Page, Binding Assay, Fluorescence, Standard Deviation